Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.16 seconds)

J.Samuel & Ors vs Gattu Mhesh & Ors on 16 January, 2012

In the said decision, it has been held that if there is mistake it will not come within the purview of the term "due diligence". In the present case, according to the plaintiffs-petitioners, the mistake was detected after passing of the preliminary judgment. In such circumstances, if the amendment is not allowed then it will certainly occasion failure of justice and shall lead to multiplicity of proceedings between the parties. The court below without considering this aspect of the matter and without considering as to whether it is necessary for deciding the real controversy between the parties has rejected the amendment application by cryptic order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 429 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1