Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)Medical Council Of India vs State Of Karnataka And Others on 16 July, 1998
Further while upholding the validity of these
Regulations, in Medical Council of India v. State of
Karnataka and others [(1998) 6 SCC 131, at 154] this Court
has observed that these regulations are framed to carry out
the purposes of the Medical Council Act and for various
purposes mentioned in Section 33. If a regulation falls
within the purposes referred under Section 33 of the Medical
Council Act, it will have mandatory force.
State Of Punjab vs Renuka Singla on 26 November, 1993
Similarly in the
State of Punjab & Ors. v. Renuka Singla and others [(1994)
1 SCC 175], Court held thus: -
Krishna Priya Ganguly Etc vs University Of Lucknow & Ors. Etc on 7 October, 1983
Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned Solicitor General
appearing for the appellant further contended that the MCI
and DCI being the expert bodies having powers to supervise
the qualifications or eligibility standards for admission
and invigilation to prevent substandard entrance
qualification in these courses, judicial review of the
decision of these expert bodies is not excluded, but the
courts would be slow to interfere in the decision of such
expert bodies. For this, he placed reliance on the decision
of this Court in Krishna Priya Ganguly and Others v.
University of Lucknow and Others [(1984) 1 SCC 307] wherein
Court observed:
State Of Maharashtra vs Vikas Sahebrao Roundale And Ors on 11 August, 1992
He also referred to a three-Judge Bench decision of this
Court in State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale
and others [(1992) 4 SCC 435] wherein it was held that the
students of unrecognized and unauthorized educational
institutions could not have been permitted by the High Court
on a writ petition being filed to appear in examination and
to be accommodated in recognized institutions. The Court
observed "slackening the standard and judicial fiat to
control the mode of education and examining system are
detrimental to the efficient management of the education".
Guru Nanak Dev University vs Parminder Kr. Bansal And Another And ... on 29 April, 1993
Similarly in Guru Nanak Dev University v. Parminder Kr.
Bansal [(1993) 4 SCC 401], another three-Judge Bench of this
Court interfered with the interim order passed by the High
Court to allow students to undergo internship course even
without passing the MBBS examination. It was held that "the
courts should not embarrass academic authorities by
themselves taking over their functions."
A.P. Christians Medical Educational ... vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr on 24 April, 1986
In A.P. Christians
Medical Educational Society v. Govt. of A.P. [(1986) 2
SCC 667] this Court observed that the Court cannot by its
fiat direct the University to disobey the statute to which
it owes its existence and the regulations made by the
University itself as that would be destructive of the rule
of law.
State Of H.P. And Ors. vs Himachal Institute Of Engg. And ... on 4 January, 1996
As against this, learned senior counsel Mr. Shanti
Bhushan submitted that the Institution has given admission
to 100 students on the basis of the order passed by the High
Court of Allahabad and, therefore, it would not be just to
hold that Institution has acted de hors the statutory
regulations. He pointed out that this Court has not stayed
the operation of the impugned order passed by the Allahabad
High Court. It has been pointed out that respondent College
functions on 'no profit no loss' basis and it would not be
in the interest of society to drag the management to a
situation where it may be compelled to close down the
institution. In any case, it would be a great loss of
public money besides jeopardising the career of students
admitted. For this purpose, he referred to State of H.P.
and others v. Himachal Institute of Engineering and
Technology, Shimla [(1998) 8 SCC 501] and submitted that in
such a situation either the seats must remain vacant and be
wasted or the management must be permitted to fill those
seats on a reasonable criteria adopted by the management.
He submitted that an effective solution has to be found out
as observed by this Court, otherwise the Institution would
not be able to meet the expenses for running the
professional course and would be placed on the Hobson's
choice of either suffering huge losses or closing down the
Institution.