Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.41 seconds)
Mukesh Meena vs Revenue Cbic on 17 April, 2023 cites

Hira Lal vs D.D.A. And Ors. on 8 May, 1995

In the case of Hira Lal Vs. DDA (supra), the suspension was revoked when disciplinary proceedings were not pending whereas in the instant case when the suspension was revoked, the disciplinary and criminal proceedings, both were pending against Page 14 of 16 O.A.163/2022 the applicant, hence this case will not be applicable to the facts of the present matter.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Agarwal vs Union Of India And Anr on 6 October, 2015

In the case of Vijay Kumar Agarwal Vs. UOI and another (supra), vide interim order dated 2nd November, 1988, Hon'ble High Court in Writ Petition stayed the proceedings in the charge sheet which was served upon the petitioner on 6 July, 1988, whereas in the instant case when the suspension was revoked, the disciplinary and criminal proceedings, both were pending against the applicant, hence this case will not be applicable to the applicant to the facts of the present matter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 27 - A K Sikri - Full Document

T.C. Sivakumar vs Union Of India & Ors. on 15 November, 2021

3. Pursuant to the charge sheet, as referred to above, the inquiry report was submitted by the Inquiry Officer, wherein the petitioner was not found guilty. The Disciplinary Authority ('DA', for short) after considering the inquiry report, gave a disagreement note on the inquiry report to the petitioner in November 2018. The petitioner submitted his response to the disagreement note. In April 2019, a penalty order was passed by the Authority under the signatures of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India ('GOI', for short), whereby the pay of the petitioner was reduced from ₹1,51,400/- to ₹1,47,000/- for a period of one year with immediate effect, with a further direction that he will not earn increments of pay during the period of such reduction and on the expiry of such period the reduction will have the effect of postponing his future increments of pay.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - V K Rao - Full Document

Brig. K.S. Rao, Air Commodore S.P. ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 29 August, 2002

LLJ 855 Hira Lal vs. DDA Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ASHEESH Signing Date:15.11.2021 14:24:45 & Ors. and AIR 1987 SC 2257 O.P.Gupta vs. UOI & Ors. it has been held that while revoking the suspension it is the duty of the competent authority to pass an order regarding pay and allowances for the period a government servant remained under suspension and that the composite order has to be a part of the same transaction having two parts and that the power to revoke the suspension cannot be exercised in isolation of the power to pass an order regarding pay and allowances.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 77 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Vijay Kumar Aggarwal vs Union Of India & Anr. on 14 December, 2010

19. Insofar as the plea of Mr. Mohanty that the period of suspension needs to be treated as on duty and the petitioner is entitled to the full salary for the period November 20, 2014, till May 30, 2016, is concerned, Mr. Mohanty is justified in advancing the plea that the Authority, while revoking the suspension order, did not decide, in what manner the suspension period shall be treated. Even assuming that on the date when the suspension was revoked, the disciplinary proceedings were not complete, even then I find that the DA while passing the final order, has also not decided, in what manner the suspension period shall be treated. In fact, till date, there is no order in that regard. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of Vijay Kumar Aggarwal (supra) has by referring to FR 54-B has held that the law is that if while revoking the suspension or within a reasonable time thereof, no order is passed pertaining to pay and allowances for the period of suspension, the Authority is denuded from passing such order and the inevitable result would be, a government servant would be entitled to full salary for the period he remained under suspension. The relevant paragraph is reproduced as under: -
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - P Nandrajog - Full Document
1