Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)
V.Subramanian vs State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By on 10 February, 2011 cites

B.C. Chaturvedi vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 November, 1995

31. The Supreme Court in B.C.Chaturvedi v. Union of India [1995(6) SCC 749], indicated that in normal cases, when it is found that the punishment imposed by the authority is disproportionately excessive so as to shock the judicial conscience, the Court has to remit the matter to the administrator for awarding appropriate punishment. It was also held that in appropriate cases, the Court can modify the punishment by moulding the relief. The observation reads thus:
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 2256 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

V. Ramana vs A.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors on 5 September, 2005

32. The Supreme Court in V.Ramana v. A.P.SRTC [2005(7) SCC 338], after conducting a survey of earlier decided cases, regarding the jurisdiction of the Court to interfere with the decision of the disciplinary/appellate authority in the matter of punishment, observed that in normal circumstances, it would be appropriate to direct the disciplinary authority to re-consider the punishment instead of modifying the punishment by the Court. The Supreme Court said:
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 226 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1