Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.31 seconds)
Pittala Mogili vs The Chairman And Managing Director And 3 ... on 19 May, 2020 cites

Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik ... vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. on 17 July, 1990

"17. As the settlement entered into in the course of conciliation proceedings assumes crucial importance in the present case, it is necessary for us to recapitulate the fairly well-settled legal position and principles concerning the binding effect of the settlement and the grounds on which the settlement is vulnerable to attack in an industrial adjudication. Analysing the relative scope of various clauses of Section 18, this Court in Barauni Refinery Pragatisheel Shramik Parishad v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. [(1991) 1 SCC 4 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 1] succinctly summarised the position thus: (SCC p. 5) Xxxxxxxx
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 213 - Full Document

Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994

In Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana1 this Court has taken note of the object underlying the rules providing for appointment on compassionate grounds and has held that the Government or the public authority concerned has to examine the financial condition of the family of the deceased and it is only if it is satisfied, that but for the provision of employment, the family will not be able to meet the crisis that a job is to be offered to the eligible member of the family. In that case the Court was considering the question whether appointment on compassionate grounds could be made against posts higher than posts in Classes III and IV. It was held that such appointment could only be made against the lowest posts in non-manual categories...."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 2647 - P B Sawant - Full Document
1   2 3 Next