Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (1.91 seconds)
Dr Vijaylaxmi vs The Registrar on 5 January, 2026 cites

Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi vs University Of Rajasthan And Ors on 13 January, 1993

Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission v. Alpanas the High Court a has held (1) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria b shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 328 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Bhupinderpal Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 1 May, 2000

"27. On the subject of absence of last date to showcase their eligibility by a candidate apropos their equivalent claim, this Court clarified the correct position of law in its decision in Bhupinderpal Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others, where, while upholding the view taken by High Court of Punjab and Haryana, held that the eligibility criteria for candidates aspiring public employment shall be determined pertaining to the cut-off date as outlined in the applicable rules of their respective service. In case the rules are silent, the decisive date is, ideally, indicated in the advertisement for recruitment. However, in case of absence of specifications in both context, the eligibility is to be adjudged in lieu of the
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 178 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

District Collector And Chairman ... vs M. Tripura Sundari Devi on 20 April, 1990

Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission v. Alpanas the High Court a has held (1) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria b shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 715 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Dr. M.V. Nair vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 22 January, 1993

Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission v. Alpanas the High Court a has held (1) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria b shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 152 - Full Document

U.P. Public Service Commission vs Alpana on 17 January, 1994

Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission v. Alpanas the High Court a has held (1) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria b shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 192 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Shankar K. Mandal & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 17 April, 2003

18. Yet again in Shankar K. Mandal v. State of Bihar 10 this Court held that the following principles could be culled out from the aforementioned decisions: (SCC p. 523, para 5) "(1) The cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 154 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next