Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.35 seconds)Section 263 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Sm. Sima Rani Mohanti vs Puspa Rani Pal on 13 May, 1977
In another case titled as Smt. Sima Rani Mohanty Vs.
Pushpa Rani reported as AIR 1978 Calcutta 140, it was held that any
interest, however, slight and even the bare possibility of an interest is
sufficient to entitle a person to make an application for revocation.
Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Section 13 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
George Anthony Harris vs Millicent Spencer on 11 August, 1932
In this regard reliance can be placed on a judgment in case
titled as George Anthony Harris Vs. Millicent Spencer reported as AIR
1933 Bombay 370. In the said case it was held that a person applying
for revocation for the grant must show that he has an interest in the
alleged Will i.e. in the estate of the deceased disposed of by the
alleged Will. There must be some interest and even the slightest
interest is sufficient to apply for revocation.
Section 276 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Sadananda Pyne vs Harinam Sha And Anr. on 16 September, 1949
25. The Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in
case Sadanand Pyne Vs. Harinam Sha and Anr. reported as AIR 1950
Mahendri Kumari Vs. Manish Kumar
-: 14 :-
Calcutta 179 has observed that in order to have the locus standi to
apply for revocation of the probate, a person must have an interest in
the estate of the deceased presuming he had died intestate.
1