Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath And Others vs The State on 28 July, 1961
In view of the decision of this court in Kanshi Nath (supra) the
arguments made on behalf of the State by the learned APP that the trial court
CRL. L.P. 394/2015 Page 4 of 5
should have only considered the CFL report and not the PA report holds no
ground as the perusal of the trial court judgment delineates substantial variance
between the report of the PA and the Director CFL in terms of the percentage
of 'milk solids not fat'. The State has not satisfactorily explained the said
variance.