Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.45 seconds)The Prisons Act, 1894
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 [Entire Act]
The Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
State Of Tamil Nadu Through ... vs Nalini And 25 Others on 11 May, 1999
In case of Nalini (Supra), this Court while dealing with the contention that if the accused are acquitted for the offence punishable under TADA then their confessional statements cannot be relied upon for convicting the accused for other offences, negatived the same and observed (in para 82), "the correct position is that confessional statement duty recorded under Section 15 of TADA would continue to remain admissible as far the other offences under any other law which too were tried along with TADA offences, no matter that the accused was acquitted of offences under TADA in that trial". The Court observed that it was undisputed that a duly recorded confessional statement is a substantive evidence in the trial of offences under TADA.