Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.40 seconds)

Cadila Healthcare Limited vs Lupin Laboratories Ltd. And Anr. on 26 April, 2006

18. It is true that the ultimate view taken in the said decision is in conformity with the aforesaid statutory provisions of the Bombay Civil Court Act read with the provisions of Gujarat Civil Court Act, but there is no express reference to the aforesaid statutory provision. It appears that in the said decision, Court considered the Scheme and manner of appointment of Presiding Officers of Fast Track Courts. Even otherwise also, the Judgement is not of any help to the petitioner since the petitioner contended before the Lower Court otherwise that the Court of the Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court has no power to try the application under Section 72 of the BPT Act.
Gujarat High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 Next