Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.28 seconds)
Satyabir Kaushik Son Of Rajendra ... vs The Chief Of Army Staff Through The ... on 23 April, 2007
cites
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
B.C. Chaturvedi vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 November, 1995
In B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors. , which has been referred to in the aforesaid decision in G. Ganayutham (supra) the Supreme Court after referring to a number of its earlier decisions observed as under:
The Army Act, 1950
Ranjit Thakur vs Union Of India And Ors on 15 October, 1987
In our view, the observation in Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India , extracted above, have been misunderstood. In that case the facts were such that they disclosed a bias on the part of the commanding officer. In that case the appellant Ranjit Thakur had fallen out of favour of the commanding officer because he had complained against the commanding officer. For making such a complaint the commanding officer had sentenced him to 28 days rigorous imprisonment. While he was serving the sentence he was served with another charge-sheet which read as follows:
Rai Bareli Kshetriya Gramin Bank vs Bhola Nath Singh & Ors on 28 February, 1997
15. The Supreme Court in Rae Bareli Kshetriya Gramin Bank v. Bhola Nath Singh and Ors. observed:
R.S. Saini vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 9 September, 1999
In R.S. Saini v. State of Punjab , the Supreme Court observed:
Lalit Popli vs Canara Bank & Ors on 18 February, 2003
In the case of Lalit Popli v. Canara Bank and Ors. the Supreme Court observed:
Union Of India & Another vs G. Ganayutham on 27 August, 1997
In B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors. , which has been referred to in the aforesaid decision in G. Ganayutham (supra) the Supreme Court after referring to a number of its earlier decisions observed as under:
Apparel Export Promotion Council vs A.K. Chopra on 20 January, 1999
In Apparel Export Promotion Council v. A.K. Chopra , the Supreme Court again observed: