Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.21 seconds)Section 320 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
B.S. Joshi & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 13 March, 2003
59. B.S.Joshi v. State of Haryana,
(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant v. CBI
(2008) 9 SCC 677 Manoj Sharma v. State,
(2008) 16 SCC 1 and Shiji v. Radhika,
(2011) 10 SCC 705 do illustrate the
principle that the High Court may quash
criminal proceedings or FIR or complaint in
exercise of its inherent power under Section
482 of the Code and Section 320 does not
limit or affect the powers of the High Court
under Section 482. Can it be said that by
quashing criminal proceedings in B.S.Joshi,
Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma and Shiji's
case this Court has compounded the non-
compoundable offences indirectly? We do
not think so. There does exist the
distinction between compounding of an
9
offence under Section 320 and quashing of
a criminal case by the High Court in
exercise of inherent power under Section