Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.68 seconds)Ram Lakhan Singh And Ors vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 May, 1977
In fact, to do so, we
derive strength from the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of S.
Nambi Narayanan (supra) and Ram Lakhan Singh (supra).
S. Nambi Narayanan vs Siby Mathews & Others Etc. on 14 September, 2018
In fact, to do so, we
derive strength from the judgments of the Supreme Court in the case of S.
Nambi Narayanan (supra) and Ram Lakhan Singh (supra).
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
26. At this juncture, the ratio, laid down in the case of State
of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, may be
profitably invoked, wherein the Supreme Court while
summarizing the discussion in paragraph 102, held against
clause No. 5 that where the allegations made in the FIR or
complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis
of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion
that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the
accused, a case for quashing is made out. When the
improbability of events, taking place on 03.07.2016, was
brought to the notice of Court an attempt was made to change
the very date of occurrence of offence.
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1