Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H on 3 May, 2010
It has also been held in Damodar S. Prabhu Vs Sayed Babala H.
of Supreme Court of India that if the matter is compromised in the court of
Appeal before the court of Sessions Court than the same be allowed on the
condition that the accused will pay 15 percent of the cheque amount by way
of cost. It has also been held that scale of cost has been suggested in the
interest of uniformity. The competent court can of course reduce the costs
with regard to the specific facts and circumstances of a case, while recording
reasons in writing for such variance.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K.M. Ibrahim vs K.P. Mohammed & Anr on 2 December, 2009
It has also been held in K.M.Ibrahim V. K.P. Mohammed and
Anr.,2009 (14) SCALE 262 that " It is true that the application under section
147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was made by the parties after the
proceedings had been concluded before the Appellate Forum. However,
Section 147 of the aforesaid Act does not bar the parties from compounding
an offence under Section 138 even at the appellate stage of the proceedings.
Accordingly, we find no reason to reject the application under Section 147 of
the aforesaid Act even in a proceeding under Article 136 of the Constitution."
1