Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)
Sree Lakshmi Silks vs Remanika Silks Pvt. Ltd. on 21 May, 1998 cites

Central Bank Of India vs Sukhani Mining And Engineering ... on 22 April, 1976

In the decision in Central Bank of India v. Sukhani Mining and Engineering Industries P. Ltd. [1977] 47 Comp Cas 1, a single judge of the Patna High Court has held that winding up proceedings is not merely for the benefit of the petitioner but for all shareholders, creditors or contri-butories of the company and, therefore, winding up proceedings could not be stayed or dismissed merely because the creditor has filed a suit against the company.
Patna High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

V.K. Jain vs Richa Laboratories (P) Ltd. on 20 April, 1993

22. I am in respectful agreement with the above principles of law laid by the various High Courts referred to above. Therefore, the contention that as the petitioner has already filed a suit before the sub-court, Coimbatore, for realisation of the amount alleged to have been due from the respondent the above petition to wind up the respondent-company is not sustainable, cannot be accepted.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1