Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)

Phool Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 December, 2021

11. Having heard the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State, and upon perusal of record, evidence, accusations made, complicity of accused, nature and gravity of offence and coupled with the fact that the prosecutrix in her statements under Section 161/164 Cr.P.C. has supported the F.I.R. in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Phool Singh Vs. State of M.P. (2022) 2 SCC 74. prosecution of an accused for an offence of rape or sexual assault can be maintained even in the absence of medical evidence. The prosecutrix is a young girl aged about 16 years whose modesty was deliberately and forcibly dislodged.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 154 - M R Shah - Full Document

X (Minor) vs State Of U.P. And Another on 21 March, 2022

The judgment of the Supreme Court in X (minor) Vs. State of Jharkhand and another (2022) Live Law (SC) 194, there being nothing on record to dislodge the credibility of the prosecutrix or to infer malicious or false prosecution of the applicant, but without making any comments on the merits of the case, this Court does not find any good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Allahabad High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 54 - S Ahmed - Full Document
1