Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)
Bakir Ali Rangwala S O Haji Ghulam Ali vs State Of Madhya Pradesh Through ... on 3 January, 2025 cites

Bakir Ali Rangwala S O Haji Ghulam Ali vs State Of Madhya Pradesh Through ... on 5 May, 2022

10. Learned Counsel for the State Pollution Control Board has filed the detailed report with written report Annexure dated 02.01.2025 with repetition of facts that total area was recorded as water body/pond in the settlement year 1927 and further it was in the name of State in the record year 1950-51. The conclusion as submitted by the 13 O A No.11/2022(CZ) Bakir Ali Rangwala vs. State Of M.P. & Ors.
National Green Tribunal Cites 67 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

M.C. Mehta vs Kamal Nath & Ors on 13 December, 1996

In M. C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath and Others (1997) 1 SCC 388, the Court enunciated the doctrine of "public trust", the thrust of that theory is that certain common properties such as rivers, seashores, forests and the air are held by the Government in trusteeship for the free and unimpeded use of the general public. The resources like air, sea, waters and the forests have such a great importance to the people as a whole, that it would be totally unjustified to make them a subject of private ownership. The State, as a custodian of the natural resources, has a duty to maintain them not merely for the 2 benefit of the public, but for the best interest of flora and fauna, wildlife and so on. The doctrine of 'public trust' has to be addressed in that perspective.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 356 - K Singh - Full Document

K. Ramadas Shenoy vs The Chief Officers, Town Municipal ... on 9 August, 1974

"149 In K. Ramadas Shenoy v. Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Chief Justice AN Ray speaking for a two judge Bench of this Court observed that the municipality functions for public benefit and when it ―acts in excess of the powers conferred by the Act or abuses those powers then in those cases it is not exercising its jurisdiction irregularly or wrongly but it is usurping powers which it does not possess". This Court also held:
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 256 - A N Ray - Full Document
1   2 Next