Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.44 seconds)

M/S. A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. .. ... vs State Of Kerala & Ors. .. Respondents on 14 December, 2006

delay, : the Original Application is also barred by time and as such ce _ there is no question of extending any benefit to the applicant herein, Reliance in support of the contentions is placed upon ae : Ae STEEL RE-ROLLING MILL LTD. VS. STATE OF 'that. benefit of a judgement iS not extended to a case automaticaly While granting relief, a court is entitled to "consider the fact situation Obtaining in each case including ee conduct of the petitioner and whether he/she had chosen to sit" over the 'Matter and. then wake up after decision of the if Case is filed after 4 long delay, it would disentitle him/her to obtain a discretionary relief. On the question of titled.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 229 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Harish Kumar Matlani And Ors vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 5 April, 2019

MANISH CHAUDHARY Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER decided on 7.2.2019 in which it was ~ held that if a party wants to take a benefit from a court of law, he/she has to satisfy the court that he/she was diligently pursuing the matter and was prevented by sufficient cause for _ Not filing the O.A. within the period of limitation. 1i.-We have considered the rival contentions raised on behalf of the parties.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Satpal Singh @ Satyapal vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 March, 2018

15. Similarly, a Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab: and Haryana had the occasion to consider identical "controversy in the case of SATYAPAL SINGH AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER, 1999 (2) : RSJ 377. In that case it was held that the State Government -- : "should have itself granted the same relief to other similarly & situated persons though they may not have come to the "Court. The State government should under. such _ circumstances apply the law itself to the similarly situated persons instead of forcing any individual or a Union to resort to unnecessary litigation as law is already settled and only 4 -11- Persons automatically get the same relief ~ without resorting to litigation, 16 "OTHERS, 1994 (7) sc 565 : lamented that a more desery;
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1