Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)Section 8 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971
Babulal Nagar And Ors vs Shree Synthetics Ltd. & Ors on 4 May, 1984
Babulal Nagar v. Shree Synthetics Ltd. AIR 1984 SC 1164, Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal (2002) 1 SCC 33 : (2001 AIR SCW 4022) Tribunal is not circumscribed by any restrictions of Section 8-B(1) in reviewing its earlier order. Tribunal if it finds earlier order was passed erroneously can pass appropriate orders as it thinks fit.
Ghulam Qadir vs Special Tribunal & Ors on 3 October, 2001
We therefore find it ourselves unable to accept the reasoning of the Division Bench of this Court in Ibrahim's case (AIR 2001 Kerala 23) (supra) which in our view goes contrary to the reasoning of Full Bench in Pankajakshi Amma's case.
Ibrahim And Ors. vs Custodian Of Vested Forests And ... on 2 August, 2000
We therefore find it ourselves unable to accept the reasoning of the Division Bench of this Court in Ibrahim's case (AIR 2001 Kerala 23) (supra) which in our view goes contrary to the reasoning of Full Bench in Pankajakshi Amma's case.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Pankajakshy Amma And Ors. vs Custodian Of Vested Forest & ... on 13 January, 1995
We therefore find it ourselves unable to accept the reasoning of the Division Bench of this Court in Ibrahim's case (AIR 2001 Kerala 23) (supra) which in our view goes contrary to the reasoning of Full Bench in Pankajakshi Amma's case.
Sri Bagawati Tea Estates Ltd. & Anr Etc vs Government Of India & Ors on 3 February, 1995
8. We are of the view the decision of the Apex Court in Shri Bagwati Tea Estates' case (AIR 1996 SC 209) (supra) has not in any way diluted the principle laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Pankajakshy Amma's case (AIR 1995 Kerala 225) (supra). while dealing with Section 8(3) of the Vesting Act the Apex Court held that the words 'due to failure to produce relevant data or other particulars' mean what they say. It must be a failure to produce relevant date or particulars; it cannot mean a mere change of opinion on the same material or on the same evidence.