Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.66 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Bhikamchand Jankilal on 20 August, 1980

11. The question before us is whether the assessee trust fulfills the conditions stipulated in section 80G(5)(iii) of the IT Act as this meant only for the benefit of one community namely Perika community and not more than one community i.e. the Trust is not created or established for the benefit of SC, Backward classes and ST. For the proposition of plural include singular, we refer to the decision of Hon'ble MP High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Bhikamchand Jankilal, [1981] 131 ITR 554 (MP) wherein it has been held as follows:
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., K.L. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), The Collector Of ... on 20 December, 2002

speculative transaction or transactions". There is nothing in the context of Expln. 2 to show that to constitute a speculation business a different definition of " business " from that as given in Section 2(13) should be applied and that a single speculative transaction, though it is an adventure in the nature of trade, cannot amount to a speculation business. Contrary intention to exclude the operation of the rule that the plural includes the singular is not readily inferred. The rule is not excluded merely because the relevant provision is drafted in the plural and the subsidiary and ancillary provisions follow the same pattern and use plural words or words implying the plural. It is only when the substance and the tenor of the legislation as a whole suggests to the contrary that the rule, that the plural includes the singular and vice versa, can be taken to be excluded. [See Sin Poh Amalgamated (H.K.) Ltd. v. Attorney-General [1965] 1 All ER 225 (PC), Blue Metal Indus- tries Ltd. v. R. W. Dilley [1969] 3 All ER 437; [1971] 41 Comp Cas 833 (PC) and Floor v. Dams (Inspector of Tuxes) [1979] 2 AH ER 677 (HL)]. Applying these principles, we do not find anything- in the Explanation or in any other provision of the Act to show an intention to exclude the operation of the rule that the plural includes the singular."
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 40 - H L Gokhale - Full Document
1