Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.83 seconds)Rajes Kanta Roy vs Santi Debi on 19 November, 1956
This Court referred to Sections 19 and 21
of the 1882 Act, Sections 119 and 120 of the Indian Succession Act and
reiterated one of the propositions laid down in Rajes Kanta Roy v. Santi
Devi (supra) by making the following observations:
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(Garapati) Gangaraju vs Pendyala Somanna on 13 August, 1926
304 and in Gangaraju v. Somanna
A.I.R. 1927 Mad. 197.
Section 119 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 120 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
A. Sreenivasa Pai And Anr vs Saraswathi Ammal Allas G. Kamala Bai on 12 July, 1985
In A. Sreenivasa Pai and another v. Saraswathi Ammal alias G.
Kamala Bai (supra), this Court considered whether by virtue of Settlement
Deed executed by appellant A. Sreenivasa Pai in favour of his mother-in-law
Padmavathi Ammal, the latter became absolute owner of the properties
described in the plaint `A' schedule and upon her death, her daughter S.
Lakshmi Ammal acquired title to the said properties under the law of
22
inheritance being the sole heir of the deceased. While dealing with the issue,
the Court referred to the terms of Settlement Deed and held that A.
Sreenivasa Pai desired to give the properties to V. Sreenivasa Pai absolutely
subject to the life interest conferred on Padmavathi Ammal and he had no
intention to give the properties to be enjoyed by Padmavathi Ammal and by
her heirs from generation to generation.
Namburi Basava Subrahmanyam vs Alapati Hymavathi & Ors on 2 April, 1996
In Namburi Basava Subrahmanyam v. Alapati Hymavathi and
others (supra), this Court observed that the nomenclature of the document is
not conclusive and the Court has to find whether the document confers any
interest in the property in praesenti so as to take effect intra vivos and
whether an irrevocable interest thereby is created in favour of the recipient,
all those to be gathered from the recitals of the documents as a whole and
observed:
Venkatasubramaniya Iyer vs Srinivasa Iyer on 18 March, 1929
In Venkatasubramaniya Iyer v. Srinivasa Iyer (supra), the question
considered was whether the document marked Exhibit - C is a Settlement or
a Will. The learned Single Judge answered the question in the following
words: