Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)Malik Mazhar Sultan & Anr vs U.P. Public Service Commission & Ors on 3 April, 2006
8. It is submitted that as per the directions issued in the case of Malik Mazar
Sultan (supra) all the existing/anticipating vacancies are to be filled up
irrespective of the fact whether those vacancies have been advertised or
not until the time the process comes to an end.
Rakhi Ray & Ors vs High Court Of Delhi & Ors on 1 February, 2010
18. Having regard to the fact that the petitioners at the first opportunity
available could have ascertained the existing/anticipating number of
vacancies which they did not, thus they have not challenged the
advertisement. Besides that the Supreme Court in the case of Rakhi Ray
& Ors. (supra), has categorically held that the vacancies over and above
the vacancies advertised cannot be filled up. Resultantly, we do not find it
necessary to issue notice. Both the writ petitions are without any merit
and the same are dismissed accordingly. No costs.
CM APPL.17465/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(C) 8285/2015
CM APPL.9443/2015 (STAY) IN W.P.(C) 22069/2015
Ashok Kumar & Ors vs The Chairman, Banking Service ... on 9 November, 1995
Haryana State Electricity Board & Ors. (1996) 4 SCC 319;
and Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. Chairman, Banking Service
Recruitment Board & Ors. AIR 1996 SC 976).
Surinder Singh And Ors. Etc vs State Of Punjab And Anr. Etc on 27 August, 1997
17. The purpose of quoting extensively the judgment rendered by the Full
Bench in Sanjeet Singh (supra) is that identical grounds, which are
sought to be urged before us today, have already been considered by the
Full Bench and the same were rejected primarily based on the judgment
rendered by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Rakhi Ray (supra).
Kamlesh Kumar Sharma vs Yogesh Kumar Gupta & Ors on 9 February, 1998
11. Similar view has been re-iterated in Madan Lal v. State of J &
K & Ors. AIR 1995 SC 1088;Kamlesh Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh
Kumar Gupta & Ors. AIR 1998 SC 1021; Sri Kant Tripathi v. State
of U.P. & Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 237; State of J & K v. Sanjeev
Kumar & Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 148;State of U.P. v. Raj Kumar
Sharma & Ors. (2006) 3 SCC 330; and Ram Avtar Patwari & Ors.
v. State of Haryana & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 3242).
Sri Kant Tripathi & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 7 September, 2001
11. Similar view has been re-iterated in Madan Lal v. State of J &
K & Ors. AIR 1995 SC 1088;Kamlesh Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh
Kumar Gupta & Ors. AIR 1998 SC 1021; Sri Kant Tripathi v. State
of U.P. & Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 237; State of J & K v. Sanjeev
Kumar & Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 148;State of U.P. v. Raj Kumar
Sharma & Ors. (2006) 3 SCC 330; and Ram Avtar Patwari & Ors.
v. State of Haryana & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 3242).
State Of U.P. & Ors vs Rajkumar Sharma & Ors on 3 March, 2006
11. Similar view has been re-iterated in Madan Lal v. State of J &
K & Ors. AIR 1995 SC 1088;Kamlesh Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh
Kumar Gupta & Ors. AIR 1998 SC 1021; Sri Kant Tripathi v. State
of U.P. & Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 237; State of J & K v. Sanjeev
Kumar & Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 148;State of U.P. v. Raj Kumar
Sharma & Ors. (2006) 3 SCC 330; and Ram Avtar Patwari & Ors.
v. State of Haryana & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 3242).
Ram Avtar Patwari And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 28 September, 2007
11. Similar view has been re-iterated in Madan Lal v. State of J &
K & Ors. AIR 1995 SC 1088;Kamlesh Kumar Sharma v. Yogesh
Kumar Gupta & Ors. AIR 1998 SC 1021; Sri Kant Tripathi v. State
of U.P. & Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 237; State of J & K v. Sanjeev
Kumar & Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 148;State of U.P. v. Raj Kumar
Sharma & Ors. (2006) 3 SCC 330; and Ram Avtar Patwari & Ors.
v. State of Haryana & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 3242).
State Of Punjab vs Raghbir Chand Sharma & Anr on 30 October, 2001
In State of Punjab v. Raghbir Chand Sharma & Ors. AIR 2001
SC 2900, this Court examined the case where only one post was
advertised and the candidate whose name appeared at Serial No. 1
in the select list joined the post, but subsequently resigned. The
Court rejected the contention that post can be filled up offering the
appointment to the next candidate in the select list observing as
under:-