Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)

Eradu And Ors. vs State Of Hyderabad on 1 November, 1955

In Eradu v. State of Hyderabad, AIR 1956 SC 316 it was observed that it is a fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence that Criminal Appeal No. 42-DB of 2006 16 circumstances evidence should point inevitably to the conclusion that it was the accused and the accused only who were the perpetrators of the offence and such evidence should be incompatible with the innocence of the accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 241 - Full Document

Earabhadrappa Alias Krishnappa vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 1983

In Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1983 SC 446 it was observed that in cases in which the evidence is purely of a circumstantial nature, the facts and circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is sought to be drawn must be fully established beyond any reasonable doubt and the facts and circumstances should not only be consistent with the guilt of the accused but they must be entirely incompatible with the innocence of the accused and must exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with his innocence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 502 - A P Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next