Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.08 seconds)
Raj Kumar vs General Manager N C Rly on 2 May, 2023 cites

Auditor General Of India vs G.Ananta Rajeswara Rao on 8 April, 1993

They further say that as per the pronouncement given by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Auditor General of India and Ors vs. G. Anant Rajeswara Rao (supra) and memorandum issued by the Railway Board on 13.12.1995, it is clear that grandson of the deceased employee is not entitled for compassionate appointment, hence, claim of the applicant for compassionate appointment to the grandson of the deceased employee cannot be acceptable in the eye of law and the order dated 03.11.2011 passed by the Assistant Personnel Officer on behalf of Divisional Railway Manager, North central Railway, Allahabad is perfectly valid in the eye of law. They further say that the applicant has only passed 8th class and presently qualification for appointment in Group „D‟ is High School. Hence, claim of the applicant cannot be accepted, in view of his educational qualification, as such order dated 03.11.2011 is as per existing laws. Hence, the claim of the applicant cannot be granted and the OA should be dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 96 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

7. As rightly argued by the respondents counsel there is no vested right to compassionate appointment it is only given in cases of immediate indigent. From death of the deceased bread earner of the family in 2002, now more than 20 years have elapsed, hence, no urgency, pecuniary immediate financial crises in the family is in any way can be substantiated. As the applicant was not major at the time of death of his grandfather and compassionate appointment is given in cases of indigent circumstances of the family to tied over immediate financial crises and anyone who is major whether wife or children can be given at that point of time. The Page 4 of 5 OA No. 708 of 2012 compassionate appointment cannot wait for someone to become major then his claim as a right can survive because that goes against the grain in the case of Secretary, State Of Karnataka and Ors vs. Umadevi And Others - [(2006) 4 SCC 1]. In which the Hon‟ble Supreme Court has observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 1670 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document
1