Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.82 seconds)
Rca No. 7/ vs Sh. Vinod Kumar on 30 April, 2011 cites

Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. vs Nri Financial Services Limited & Ors. on 16 February, 2000

In this regard he relied upon "Goyal MG Gases Ltd. V. Premium International Finance Ltd. & Ors. 138 (2007) Delhi Law Times 259, Vijaya Home Loans Ltd. V. M/s Crown Traders Ltd. & Another 2001 VII AD (Delhi) 475, Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. V. NRI Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. 2000 IV AD (Delhi) 768, Motilal RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 5 of 15 Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. V. Standard Chartered Bank, Manu/DE/0129/2007, Hans Raj V. Lakhi Ram AIR 2005 Delhi 87, Punjab and Sind Bank V. Ramji Das Khanna & Anr. AIR 1984 Delhi 175".
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - V Sen - Full Document

Motilal Banarasidass Publishers ... vs Standard Chartered Bank on 8 December, 2006

In this regard he relied upon "Goyal MG Gases Ltd. V. Premium International Finance Ltd. & Ors. 138 (2007) Delhi Law Times 259, Vijaya Home Loans Ltd. V. M/s Crown Traders Ltd. & Another 2001 VII AD (Delhi) 475, Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. V. NRI Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. 2000 IV AD (Delhi) 768, Motilal RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 5 of 15 Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. V. Standard Chartered Bank, Manu/DE/0129/2007, Hans Raj V. Lakhi Ram AIR 2005 Delhi 87, Punjab and Sind Bank V. Ramji Das Khanna & Anr. AIR 1984 Delhi 175".
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 5 - R Khetrapal - Full Document

Shri Hans Raj vs Shri Lakhi Ram on 17 September, 2004

In this regard he relied upon "Goyal MG Gases Ltd. V. Premium International Finance Ltd. & Ors. 138 (2007) Delhi Law Times 259, Vijaya Home Loans Ltd. V. M/s Crown Traders Ltd. & Another 2001 VII AD (Delhi) 475, Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. V. NRI Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. 2000 IV AD (Delhi) 768, Motilal RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 5 of 15 Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. V. Standard Chartered Bank, Manu/DE/0129/2007, Hans Raj V. Lakhi Ram AIR 2005 Delhi 87, Punjab and Sind Bank V. Ramji Das Khanna & Anr. AIR 1984 Delhi 175".
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 12 - O P Dwivedi - Full Document

Goyal Mg Gases Ltd. vs Premium International Finance Ltd. And ... on 31 July, 2006

In this regard he relied upon "Goyal MG Gases Ltd. V. Premium International Finance Ltd. & Ors. 138 (2007) Delhi Law Times 259, Vijaya Home Loans Ltd. V. M/s Crown Traders Ltd. & Another 2001 VII AD (Delhi) 475, Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. V. NRI Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. 2000 IV AD (Delhi) 768, Motilal RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 5 of 15 Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. V. Standard Chartered Bank, Manu/DE/0129/2007, Hans Raj V. Lakhi Ram AIR 2005 Delhi 87, Punjab and Sind Bank V. Ramji Das Khanna & Anr. AIR 1984 Delhi 175".
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 28 - G Mittal - Full Document

M.C.D vs State Of Delhi And Anr on 29 April, 2005

5. It has been further contended that respondent/plaintiff has not come to the court with clean hands, as the plaintiff/respondent has withheld the material documents and also suppressed material facts from the court in order to gain advantage in the case, so the person who is playing fraud with the Court can be summarily be thrown out at any stage of the litigation. So the decree/judgment is liable to be set aside and in this regard he has relied upon "MCD V. State Of Delhi & Anr. (2005) 4 SCC 605".
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 68 - Full Document

Punjab And Sind Bank vs Ramji Das Khanna And Anr. on 12 April, 1983

In this regard he relied upon "Goyal MG Gases Ltd. V. Premium International Finance Ltd. & Ors. 138 (2007) Delhi Law Times 259, Vijaya Home Loans Ltd. V. M/s Crown Traders Ltd. & Another 2001 VII AD (Delhi) 475, Pleasant Securities & Finance Ltd. V. NRI Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. 2000 IV AD (Delhi) 768, Motilal RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 5 of 15 Banarasidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. V. Standard Chartered Bank, Manu/DE/0129/2007, Hans Raj V. Lakhi Ram AIR 2005 Delhi 87, Punjab and Sind Bank V. Ramji Das Khanna & Anr. AIR 1984 Delhi 175".
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Aradhana Textiles Pvt. Ltd. vs Vishnu Textiles Traders And Ors. on 27 November, 1989

12. From the perusal of order dated 29.03.2010 passed by the Ld. Trial Court, it can not be inferred that delay in putting the appearance was condoned and the adjournment was granted in order to give an opportunity to the defendant to file appearance after moving an application for condonation of delay. Appearance filed by the defendant/appellant is not accompanied by any application seeking condonation of delay. The statutory period for putting appearance is 10 days as per the procedure provide for summary suit. Even further more, the appellant/defendant had not moved application before the Ld. Trial Court for seeking condonation of delay in putting RCA No. 7/10 Page no. 12 of 15 appearance, no such ground is also made/detailed in the grounds of appeal. Judgment relied upon by the Ld. counsel for the defendant/appellant to fortify his submissions that oral application is maintainable for seeking condonation of delay is not applicable to the facts of present case. There is no dispute regarding the ratio of judgment relied upon by the defendant but there is a delay of more than one month in putting appearance by the appellant whereas in the judgment relied upon by the Ld. counsel for the defendant/appellant there was delay of only one day. So far as the judgment relied upon by the Ld. counsel for the defendant in case titled "M/s Aradhana Textile V. Vishnu Textiles (Supra)" same is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. This is not a case of defendant that on account of mistake of his counsel, he could not file appearance within the prescribed period of limitation.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1   2 Next