Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)

Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014

I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order because in the statement of the victim as well as informant given before the trial court though the names of the accused-revisionist are said to be involved in giving effect this occurrence as the accused-revisionist no. 2 is said to be driver of the vehicle in which the victim was dragged away and accused-revisionist no.1 is said to be involved in commission of gang rape upon the victim. The Supreme Court in the case of Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, (2014) 3 SCC 92 in paragraph nos. 105 and 106 has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 114 - Cited by 1591 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1