Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)

Ram Preeti Yadav vs U.P. Board Of High School And ... on 3 September, 2003

certain unknown individuals, who portrayed themselves as a Managing Committee of the temple. He places reliance on the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of RAM PREETI YADAV v. U.P. BOARD OF HIGH SCHOOL & INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION AND OTHERS reported in JT 2003 (SUPP.1) SC 25, wherein it is held that 'fraud is a conduct either by letter or words, which induces the other person, or authority to take a definite determinative stand as a response to the conduct of former either by words or letter. Although negligence is not fraud, but it can be evidence on fraud'.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 269 - S B Sinha - Full Document

S.P Chengalvaraya Naidu vs Jagannath on 27 October, 1993

He also relied upon the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.P. CHENGALVARAYA NAIDU v. JAGANNATH reported in 1994 (1) SCC 1, wherein it is observed that 'fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal. An act of fraud on court is always viewed seriously'. He has further referred few other judgments to the same effect and contended that there was a settlement between the petitioner and respondent No.4 therein in Writ Petition No.9233 of 2017 and the same was accepted by this Court. Therefore,
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 979 - K Singh - Full Document
1