Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)V.Devan vs The Tahsildar on 22 December, 2020
In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP
No.15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar,
Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in
http://www.judis.nic.in
10/14
WP No.18946 of 2021
denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on
the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even
inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy
Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the
respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and
has been rejecting such applications.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R.Lokesh Kannan vs The District Collector on 21 June, 2017
6.In view of the above facts, this writ petition is
disposed of directing the petitioner to submit a
fresh application to the second respondent
enclosing this order copy and the orders passed in
the writ petition referred above, within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of
this order. On such receipt, the second respondent
shall consider the petitioner's application and pass
orders on merits and in accordance with law, in the
light of the orders passed by this Court as stated
supra within a period of six weeks thereafter.
Section 8 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Registration Of Births And Deaths Act, 1969
1