The judgment rendered in case of
Government of Tamil Nadu v. K.N.Ramamurthy (supra) pertains to
challenge to an order of punishment inflicted after disciplinary enquiry.
Similarly the judgment in the case
of Deputy Inspector General of Police v. K.S.Swaminathan (supra) is on
the issue that even if the charge memo is totally vague and does not disclose
any misconduct for which the charges have been framed, it cannot be gone
into at the stage of framing of charges for it would be a matter of evidence
for consideration at the enquiry by the Enquiry Officer.
The judgment in the case of Surath Chandra Chakrabarty v. State
of West Bengal (supra) again deals with the issue of vagueness of charge
sheet and whether the same should be accompanied by the statement of
allegations.
ii) Government of A.P. rep. by its Secretary to
Government, I and CAD (CAD SER.II) Deptt. and others
v. M.A.Majeed and another 2006(8) SLR (AP-FB) 243.
9. Having gone through the judgments referred to above, we are of
the considered opinion that they have no application at all to the facts and
circumstances of the present case.