State Of Haryana vs Prince And Others on 16 November, 2017
8. During cross-examination of the witness by Ld. Counsel for
the accused persons, PW-3 admitted that he had not told the police
officials at the time of recording of his statement regarding the total
number of locks which he had put in his shop and which had been
broken. He admitted that he had not seen any of the accused
breaking the locks of his shop. He admitted that FIR was not
lodged on my complaint. He denied that no one had told him that
accused persons had broken the locks and due to said fact he had
not mentioned in his examination-in-chief, the name of the person
who had so told him. The police officials had prepared site plan in
State Vs. Prince and Ors.