Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)Section 154 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Khujji @ Surendra Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 July, 1991
19. Witnesses may be categorized into three distinct categories. They may be wholly reliable. Similarly there may be witnesses who can be considered wholly unreliable. There is no difficulty in placing reliance or disbelieving his evidence when an evidence is wholly reliable or wholly un-reliable, but difficulty arises in case of third category i.e. where witness is neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable. Hostile witness ordinarily falls in category of those witnesses who are neither wholly reliable nor wholly un-reliable. Hon'ble Apex Court in Khujji @ Surendra Tiwari Vs. State of M.P. AIR 1991 SC page 1853 was pleased to observe as under :-
Sucha Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2003
24. The principle of "falsus in uno falsus in omnibus" (false in one thing, false in everything) has no application in India. It is duty of Court to separate grain from chaff. Keeping in view the above principles Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sucha Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 2003 SC 3617 was pleased to observe as under :-
Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma vs State Of Uttarakhand on 27 September, 2010
25. Similarly in Paramjeet Singh v. State of Uttarakhand; AIR 2011 SC 200 also Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India was pleased to observe as under:-
Vadivelu Thevar vs The State Of Madras(With Connected ... on 12 April, 1957
34. Further, Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in the case of Vadivelu Thevar v. State of Madras; 1957 SCR 981: AIR 1957 SC 614 was pleased to observe at para 11 & 12 as under:-
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Suresh Narain Tripathi S/O Devi Dayal ... vs State Of U.P. on 4 April, 2005
36. Further, a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Suresh Narain Tripathi and others versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Others; 2005 Cril LJ 2479, granted acquittal for the offence under section 436 of IPC where the star witnesses were unreliable and was pleased to observe at para 13 as under:-
1