Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.44 seconds)Section 20 in Tamil Nadu Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 [Entire Act]
Narayanan Chettiar vs Rathinasami Padayachi on 12 September, 1952
In support of his submission, learned counsel relies on the judgment of Rajamannar C. J. in Narayanan V. Rathinasami . As against this line of argument put forth by the learned counsel for the decree-holder, Mr. N. vanchinathan, learned counsel for the judgment-debtor, would submit that on the facts and in the context of the case it would be a misnomer to rely on the later part of the proviso to S. 20 and since the earlier application under S. 19 was dismissed as 'not pressed at present' there was no rejection of the application under S. 19 on merits and hence, there is no bar law for prosecuting a fresh application under S. 19.
1