Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)
Smriti Arora vs All India Institute Of Medical Science & ... on 25 March, 2021 cites

S. Krishna Sradha vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 13 December, 2019

13. As far as S. Krishna Sradha supra is concerned, that was in facts where the students, though entitled to admission, had been denied admissions owing to the faulty admission process and/or owing to violation of rules and what was held in that case, was in the said facts. It is a settled principle of law that a judgment is a precedent on what was for adjudication and what has been adjudicated and no more.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 46 - M R Shah - Full Document

Asha vs B.D.Sharma University Of Health ... on 10 July, 2012

7. The counsels for the appellants have argued, (i) that AIIMS itself delayed the admission process and the result of the entrance examination, though originally expected to be declared in July, 2020, was declared only in October, 2020; however notwithstanding its own delays, the respondent AIIMS is insisting upon sticking to the cut-off date stipulated in the prospectus for clearing the qualifying examination; (ii) that once AIIMS itself has delayed the entrance examination, the declaration of the result thereof and the entire admission process, the cut off date should also be proportionally changed; (iii) there is no delay or fault attributable to any of the appellants and the appellants cannot be made to suffer for reasons over which they had no control and which were of general nature, applicable to all; (iv) that though AIIMS is not governed by the University Grants Commission (UGC) but UGC also has granted extension of timelines owing to the prevalent Covid-19 pandemic and on the same parameters, AIIMS also ought to have extended the cut off date and cannot deprive admission to meritorious students on such grounds; reliance is placed on S. Krishna Sradha Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1609, judgment of a three Judge Bench on a reference owing to the apparent conflict in Asha Vs. Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences (2012) 7 SCC 389 and Chandigarh Administration Vs. Jasmine Kaur (2014) 10 SCC 521, unequivocally holding that a meritorious student, for no fault of his/her, cannot be illegally denied admission particularly if he/she has pursued his/her legal right expeditiously, without delay and that such a LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 5 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 student is entitled to the relief of admission, more particularly in medical courses.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 118 - S Kumar - Full Document

Chandigarh Administration & Anr vs Jasmine Kaur & Ors on 1 September, 2014

7. The counsels for the appellants have argued, (i) that AIIMS itself delayed the admission process and the result of the entrance examination, though originally expected to be declared in July, 2020, was declared only in October, 2020; however notwithstanding its own delays, the respondent AIIMS is insisting upon sticking to the cut-off date stipulated in the prospectus for clearing the qualifying examination; (ii) that once AIIMS itself has delayed the entrance examination, the declaration of the result thereof and the entire admission process, the cut off date should also be proportionally changed; (iii) there is no delay or fault attributable to any of the appellants and the appellants cannot be made to suffer for reasons over which they had no control and which were of general nature, applicable to all; (iv) that though AIIMS is not governed by the University Grants Commission (UGC) but UGC also has granted extension of timelines owing to the prevalent Covid-19 pandemic and on the same parameters, AIIMS also ought to have extended the cut off date and cannot deprive admission to meritorious students on such grounds; reliance is placed on S. Krishna Sradha Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1609, judgment of a three Judge Bench on a reference owing to the apparent conflict in Asha Vs. Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences (2012) 7 SCC 389 and Chandigarh Administration Vs. Jasmine Kaur (2014) 10 SCC 521, unequivocally holding that a meritorious student, for no fault of his/her, cannot be illegally denied admission particularly if he/she has pursued his/her legal right expeditiously, without delay and that such a LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 5 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 student is entitled to the relief of admission, more particularly in medical courses.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 126 - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Dhanwanti Devi & Ors on 21 August, 1996

Reference in this regard may be made to Union of India Vs. Dhanwanti Devi (1996) 6 SCC 44, Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 111, Punjab National Bank Vs. R.L. Vaid (2004) 7 SCC 698 and National LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 6 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 Resource Allocation, In Re (2012) 10 SCC 1. Thus what has been held qua students denied admission owing to a violation of the Rules, cannot be applied where admissions are in compliance of the Rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 373 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Bhavnagar University vs Palitana Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 3 December, 2002

Reference in this regard may be made to Union of India Vs. Dhanwanti Devi (1996) 6 SCC 44, Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 111, Punjab National Bank Vs. R.L. Vaid (2004) 7 SCC 698 and National LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 6 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 Resource Allocation, In Re (2012) 10 SCC 1. Thus what has been held qua students denied admission owing to a violation of the Rules, cannot be applied where admissions are in compliance of the Rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 919 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Punjab National Bank vs R.L. Vaid And Ors on 20 August, 2004

Reference in this regard may be made to Union of India Vs. Dhanwanti Devi (1996) 6 SCC 44, Bhavnagar University Vs. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. (2003) 2 SCC 111, Punjab National Bank Vs. R.L. Vaid (2004) 7 SCC 698 and National LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 6 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 Resource Allocation, In Re (2012) 10 SCC 1. Thus what has been held qua students denied admission owing to a violation of the Rules, cannot be applied where admissions are in compliance of the Rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 67 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Dr. J. P. Kulshreshtha And Ors vs Chancellor, Allahabad University, Raj ... on 30 April, 1980

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 253 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 990 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Bhushan Uttam Khare vs Dean, B.J. Medical College And Ors on 28 January, 1992

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 69 - S R Pandian - Full Document

All India Council For Technical Edu vs Surinder Kumar Dhawan & Ors on 18 February, 2009

15. Though the delay in conduct of the qualifying examination or declaration of result thereof, this time around may be attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic but it is not as if in the past there were no such delays; in the past also, individual universities/colleges have delayed conduct of examinations and declaration of result and which has cost its students further admissions and in none of the cases, was it ever held, to our remembrance, that for such reasons, the provisions of the prospectus would be given a go-bye and the Courts would intervene. Even otherwise, the interference by the Courts in academic matters, which are best left to be governed to the education bodies, has to be minimal and the Courts, by making orders, cannot interfere in the running of the educational institutions and academic courses. Reference in this regard may be made to Dr. J.P. Kulshrestha (Dr.) Vs. Chancellor, Allahabad University (1980) 3 SCC 418, Maharastra State Board of Secondary Education Vs. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth (1984) 4 SCC 27, Bhushan Uttam Khare Vs. Dean, B.J. Medical College (1992) 2 SCC 220, All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan (2009) 11 SCC 726 and Basavaiah (Dr.) Vs. Dr. HL Ramesh (2010) 8 SCC 372. Already for the last nearly three months, the academic calendar of AIIMS has suffered for LPA 370/2020 & Connected Matters Page 7 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHWANI Signing Date:06.04.2021 12:24:17 the reason of interim orders in these proceedings and a year cannot be permitted to be wasted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 239 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next