Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.78 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 111 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 446 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
In Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2012) 1 SCC 40, Supreme
Court holds,
[28] We are conscious of the fact that the accused are charged
with economic offences of huge magnitude. We are also conscious
of the fact that the offences alleged, if proved, may jeopardize the
economy of the country. At the same time, we cannot lose sight of
the fact that the investigating agency has already completed
investigation and the charge sheet is already filed before the
3
3 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 26-07-2024 06:21:24 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:092043
4
CRM-M-29960-2024
CRM-M-30097-2024
Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi. Therefore, their presence in the
custody may not be necessary for further investigation. We are of
the view that the appellants are entitled to the grant of bail
pending trial on stringent conditions in order to ally the
apprehension expressed by CBI.
Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2020
In Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of
Delhi), 2020:INSC:106 [Para 92], (2020) 5 SCC 1, Para 92, the Constitutional Bench held
that unusually, subject to the evidence produced, the Courts can impose restrictive
conditions.
Madhu Tanwar And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 29 May, 2023
In Madhu Tanwar v. State of Punjab, 2023:PHHC:077618 [Para 10, 21], CRM-M-
27097-2023, decided on 29-05-2023, this court observed,
[10] The exponential growth in technology and artificial
intelligence has transformed identification techniques
remarkably. Voice, gait, and facial recognition are incredibly
sophisticated and pervasive. Impersonation, as we know it
traditionally, has virtually become impossible. Thus, the remedy
lies that whenever a judge or an officer believes that the
accused might be a flight risk or has a history of fleeing from
justice, then in such cases, appropriate conditions can be
inserted that all the expenditure that shall be incurred to trace
them, shall be recovered from such person, and the State shall
have a lien over their assets to make good the loss.
Mohammed Zubair vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 20 July, 2022
In Mohammed Zubair v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2022:INSC:735 [Para 28],
Writ Petition (Criminal) No 279 of 2022, Para 29, decided on July 20, 2022, A Three-
Judge bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court holds that "The bail conditions imposed by the
Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also
be proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts while imposing bail
conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial. While
doing so, conditions that would result in the deprivation of rights and liberties must be
eschewed."
Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1