cites: 145436193

Amarjeet Singh & Ors vs Devi Ratan & Ors on 18 November, 2009

In support of the aforesaid submissions, the respondents have placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Amarjeet Singh Vs. Devi Ratan reported in (2010) 1 SCC 417 decided on 18.11.2009.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 466 - Full Document

Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 12191

State Of Gujarat vs Umedbhai M. Patel on 27 February, 2001

11. That, so far as, the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant in the case of Umedbhai M. Patel (supra), in this regard, it is necessary to reproduce para 11 of the said judgment which reads as under :

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 276 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document

Swaran Singh Chand vs Punjab State Electricity Board & Ors on 6 May, 2009

In case of Swaran Singh Chand (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court found the said order suffers from malice in law, whereas, the same is not the position in the present case.

Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 123 - S B Sinha - Full Document

The State Of Gujarat & Anr vs Suryakant Chunilal Shah on 3 December, 1998

14. Further, the judgment cited by the Suryakant Chunilal Shah (supra), M.S.Bindra (supra), Saroj Kumar Dutta (supra) and P.P.Gautam (supra) are distinguishable on facts and not helpful to the applicant.

Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 134 - Full Document

Sukhdeo vs The Commissioner Amravati Division, ... on 2 May, 1996

(v) In the case of Sukhdeo Vs. Commissioner Amravati Division, Amravati and Anr., reported in 1996 (3) SCT 613 (SC) decided on 02.05.1996.

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 90 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

M.S. Bindra vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 September, 1998

14. Further, the judgment cited by the Suryakant Chunilal Shah (supra), M.S.Bindra (supra), Saroj Kumar Dutta (supra) and P.P.Gautam (supra) are distinguishable on facts and not helpful to the applicant.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 190 - Full Document

Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 3 - Cited by 8355

U.P. Co-Operative Sugar Factories ... vs P.S. Misra And Anr. on 11 December, 2002

14. Further, the judgment cited by the Suryakant Chunilal Shah (supra), M.S.Bindra (supra), Saroj Kumar Dutta (supra) and P.P.Gautam (supra) are distinguishable on facts and not helpful to the applicant.

Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - P Kant - Full Document

Saroj Kumar Dutta vs Union Of India And Others on 28 February, 2014

14. Further, the judgment cited by the Suryakant Chunilal Shah (supra), M.S.Bindra (supra), Saroj Kumar Dutta (supra) and P.P.Gautam (supra) are distinguishable on facts and not helpful to the applicant.

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - T Chakraborty - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]

Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]