Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)Section 7 in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 41D in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 50A in The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950
Article 213 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Shyam Lal vs 1. The State Of Uttar Pradesh2. The Union ... on 30 March, 1954
55] Mr. Godbole, learned counsel for James Baker and another,
i.e., applicants in Application No.28 of 2009, relied upon certain
principles in service jurisprudence and submitted that an employer,
Dinesh Sherla page 29 of 37
::: Uploaded on - 14/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 15/06/2017 01:21:00 :::
j-fa-1327-1328-1244-1250-wp-12089-15
in case of proved and gross misconduct on the part of employee, can
always dismiss the employee and particularly in case of government
service can impose penalty of dismissal which shall operate as
disqualification for future employment in government service. Mr.
Godbole also made reference to certain provisions of Pension
Scheme, 1995 as regards forfeiture of service, particularly in case of
gross misconduct. Mr. Godbole has also relied upon decision of
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Shyam Lal vs. State of U.P. and anr. -
AIR 1954 SC 369, in support of such submission.
1