Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.19 seconds)
Surinder Pal vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 1 February, 2008 cites

Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007

Therefore, keeping in view the aforesaid observations of the Apex Court, in the aforesaid case, and the facts of the case the petitioner if so advised, may have recourse to his alternative remedy by approaching the Magistrate concerned under the requisite provisions of law in consonance with the observations made in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and Ors. 2008 (1) RCR (Cr.) 392.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 8229 - M Katju - Full Document

Parkash Singh Badal And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 6 December, 2006

9. It was contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in the backdrop of the aforesaid facts, respondents No. 5 ought to have registered an FIR against respondent No. 6 as it is a clear case where the petitioner has been duped of a huge sum of Rs. 1,46,98,000/- and prima facie an offence under Section 156 is straightway attracted. Reliance was placed on Parkash Singh Badal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors. 2007 (1) RCR (Crl.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 82 - Cited by 659 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next