Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.41 seconds)Section 13 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
The National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985
Section 3 in U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Food Corporation Of India vs Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries on 11 November, 1992
7. The next ground of legitimate expectation, on which the
High Court's conclusion is based, is equally tenuous. That
view results from a misreading of the decision of this Court
in Food Corpn. of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries'.
It was clearly indicated in that decision that non-
consideration of legitimate expectation of a person
adversely affected by a decision may invalidate the decision
on the ground of arbitrariness even though the legitimate
expectation of that person is not an enforceable right to
provide the foundation for challenge of the decision on that
basis alone. In other words, the plea of legitimate
expectation relates to procedural fairness in decision-
making and forms a part of the rule of non-arbitrariness;
and it is not meant to confer an independent right
enforceable by itself. That apart, the manner in which
legitimate expectation has been relied on by the High Court
in the present case, is difficult to appreciate. The High
Court on this aspect has stated as under