Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.43 seconds)Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 227 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi ... vs Jitendra Bhimaraj Bijje And Ors. Etc. ... on 7 August, 1990
In Niranjan Singh Karam
Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjayya and
Others etc. reported in (1990) 4 SCC 76, after
considering the provisions of Sections 227 and 228,
Cr.P.C., the Court posed a question, whether at the
stage of framing the charge, the trial court should
marshal the materials on the record of the case as he
would do on the conclusion of the trial. The Court held
that at the stage of framing the charge inquiry must
necessarily be limited to deciding if the facts emerging
from such materials constitute the offence with which
the accused could be charged. The Court may peruse
the records for that limited purpose, but it is not
required to marshal it with a view to decide the
reliability thereof.
Supdt. & Remembrancer Of Legal Affairs ... vs Anil Kumar Bhunja & Ors on 23 August, 1979
The Court referred to earlier
decisions in State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh (1977) 4
15
Cr.R. No. 3925/2018
SCC 39, Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal
(1979) 3 SCC 4 and Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal
Affair, West Bengal vs. Anil Kumar Bhunja (1979) 4
SCC 274 and held thus:
Union Of India vs Prafulla Kumar Samal & Anr on 6 November, 1978
The Court referred to earlier
decisions in State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh (1977) 4
15
Cr.R. No. 3925/2018
SCC 39, Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal
(1979) 3 SCC 4 and Supdt. & Remembrancer of Legal
Affair, West Bengal vs. Anil Kumar Bhunja (1979) 4
SCC 274 and held thus: