Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)
New Delhi This The 19Th Day Of November vs Union Of India on 19 November, 2013 cites

Union Of India & Anr. vs Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav on 3 September, 2013

5. Both the parties were heard through the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondents. The learned counsel for the applicants stated that in the absence of denial of specific averments made in the OA as such in Paras 3.3, 3.4 to 3.9 and 3.13. the facts in the OA should be treated as admitted. On the issue of limitation, the learned counsel argued that since the OA has been filed within one month of reply received under RTI, hence it was not barred by limitation. He also argued that no reply to the rejoinder filed by the applicants has been filed by the respondents. Reliance was placed on the judgments of the Honble Delhi High Court in W.P. ( C) 2071/2007 UOI & Anr. Vs. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.; W.P. (C ) No.2094/2007 UOI & Anr. Vs. Mahender Singh Rana; W.P. (C ) No.2095/2007 UOI & Anr. Vs. Lalit Kumar Pawar & Ors.and W.P. (C) No.3410/2010 Director General Doordarshan Vs. Neeraj Bhanot, and specifically to paras 12, 13 and 15.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - S R Bhat - Full Document
1