Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.24 seconds)Section 21 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 20 in The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 33A in The Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
Vilas Gangaram Khetle vs S.D. Rane, Presiding Officer And Others on 16 November, 1981
9. She submits that the Industrial Court also failed to consider
and apply the binding principles laid down in Rajendra Z. Jagtap v.
Baramati Taluka Sahakari Kamgar Sabha (2007)1 CLR 455, Vilas
G. Khetle v. S.D. Rane 1983 Lab IC 1055, and Shivanand G.
Baswanti v. Laxmi Textile Mills (2008) 13 SCC 323. These
judgments consistently affirm the exclusive and central role of the
Representative Union in matters involving collective disputes. The
impugned order disregards this settled position of law.
The Trade Unions Act, 1926
Shivanand Gaurishankar Baswanti vs Laxmi Vishnu Textile Mills & Ors on 11 July, 2008
9. She submits that the Industrial Court also failed to consider
and apply the binding principles laid down in Rajendra Z. Jagtap v.
Baramati Taluka Sahakari Kamgar Sabha (2007)1 CLR 455, Vilas
G. Khetle v. S.D. Rane 1983 Lab IC 1055, and Shivanand G.
Baswanti v. Laxmi Textile Mills (2008) 13 SCC 323. These
judgments consistently affirm the exclusive and central role of the
Representative Union in matters involving collective disputes. The
impugned order disregards this settled position of law.