Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)Section 18 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Annappa Irappa Nesaria & Ors on 22 January, 2008
4. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the
Claims Tribunal erred in holding that a person possessed of a
licence for LMV was competent to drive a transport vehicle.
Reliance on the judgment in National Insurance Company
Limited v. Annappa Irappa Nesaria & Ors., 2008 IV AD (SC)
358 was also misplaced.
United India Insurance Company Ltd vs Lehru And Ors on 28 February, 2003
13. The Appellant was therefore entitled to the grant of recovery
rights on the basis of the law laid down in United India
Insurance Company Ltd. v. Lehru & Ors., (2003) 3 SCC 338
and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh & Ors., 2004
MAC APP 31/2009 Page 11 of 12
(3) SCC 297.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Swaran Singh & Ors on 5 January, 2004
13. The Appellant was therefore entitled to the grant of recovery
rights on the basis of the law laid down in United India
Insurance Company Ltd. v. Lehru & Ors., (2003) 3 SCC 338
and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh & Ors., 2004
MAC APP 31/2009 Page 11 of 12
(3) SCC 297.
Section 2 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Kusum Rai & Ors on 24 March, 2006
In National Insurance Co. v. Kusum Rai, (2006) 4 SCC 250
where a driver holding a driving licence to drive a Light Motor
Vehicle was held to be not entitled to drive a taxi.
M/S Natwar Parikh & Co. Ltd vs State Of Karnataka & Others on 1 September, 2005
In Natwar Pariksh & Co. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.,
(2005) 7 SCC 364, a distinction was drawn between a transport
vehicle and non transport vehicle by a three Judges Bench of the
Supreme Court. I would extract Para 24 of the report
hereunder:-
1