Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 326 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Indian Railways Act, 1890.
Section 124 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
The Explosive Substances Act, 1908
Smt. Usha Rani And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 19 November, 2003
4. Claim petition bearing OA-II-123/93, titled as Smt. Usha Singla
and others vs. Union of India, was filed by the claimants, seeking
compensation on account of death of one Om Prakash, who died in the bomb
ASHISH
2026.05.18 17:19
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this judgment/order
-3-
XOBJC-661-1995 in/and FAO-186-1994
XOBJC-662-1995 in FAO-1018-1995
XOBJC-42-CII-1995 in/and FAO-187-1994
blast incident. Tribunal awarded compensation holding that the bomb blast
falls within the ambit of 'accident' under Section 124 of the Railways Act,
1989 (hereinafter referred to as '1989 Act'). Out of the said OA, the appeal
bearing FAO No.186 of 1994 has arisen.
Santosh Kumar Jain vs The State.Union Of India--Intervener on 5 March, 1951
5. Claim petition bearing OA-II-131/93, titled as Smt. Shakuntala
Devi and others vs. Union of India and another, relates to the death of
Girdhari Lal and claim petition bearing OA-II-122/93, titled as Smt. Santosh
Jain and others vs. Union of India, relates to the death of Prem Sagar Jain.
Union Of India And Ors vs Sunil Kumar Ghosh on 21 August, 1984
9. Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others vs.
Sunil Kumar Ghosh, (1984) 4 SCC 246, while answering the question
'what is an accident' observed as under:-
Union Of India vs Rina Devi on 9 May, 2018
18. The plea raised by Mr. Jain regarding entitlement of Rs.8 lakhs
is rejected. The date on which the award was passed, the amount prescribed
was Rs.2 lakhs. Thus, the case of the claimants falls within the exceptions
carved out in Rina Devi's case (supra) and compensation has to abide by
schedule in vogue on the date of award i.e. 25.08.1993.