Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Anr vs Buddha Jagadheeswararao & Ors on 8 October, 2015
The order of the trial court as well as the High Court
holding that the document dated 09.09.1994 required
compulsory registration is upheld. Following the aforesaid
view of this Court in Yellapu Uma Maheswari (supra), this
appeal is partly allowed holding that deed dated 09.09.1994 is
admissible in evidence for collateral purpose subject to
payment of stamp duty and penalty.
Article 45 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 17 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 49 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Kale & Others vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation Ors on 21 January, 1976
11. Pertaining to family settlement, a memorandum of family
settlement and its necessity of registration, the law has been
settled by this Court. It is sufficient to refer to the
judgment of this Court in Kale and others vs. Deputy Director
of Consolidation and others, (1976) 3 SCC 119. The
propositions with regard to family settlement, its
registration were laid down by this Court in paragraphs 10 and
11: