Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.28 seconds)C/M Mihir Bhoj Inter College, Gautam ... vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 5 November, 2019
2. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order is an ex-parte order and has been passed without serving, on the petitioner, a copy of the reports relied upon by the Additional Chief Secretary and without considering the objections filed by the petitioners. It has been argued that the aforesaid impugned order is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the cases of Gautam Buddha Inter College and others vs. State of U.P. and others; 2016 (7) ADJ 665; C/M Goswami Tulsi Das Inter College and another vs. State of U.P. and 4 others, (Writ-C No. 37460 of 2022 decided on 19.12.2022; Chandrashekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, (Special Appeal No. 70 of 2023 decided on 07.02.2023 and Committee of Management, Sahid Sansmaran Inter College and others vs. Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi and others, 1993 (91) ALJ 318.
Chandrashekhar Tiwari vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 7 February, 2023
2. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order is an ex-parte order and has been passed without serving, on the petitioner, a copy of the reports relied upon by the Additional Chief Secretary and without considering the objections filed by the petitioners. It has been argued that the aforesaid impugned order is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the cases of Gautam Buddha Inter College and others vs. State of U.P. and others; 2016 (7) ADJ 665; C/M Goswami Tulsi Das Inter College and another vs. State of U.P. and 4 others, (Writ-C No. 37460 of 2022 decided on 19.12.2022; Chandrashekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, (Special Appeal No. 70 of 2023 decided on 07.02.2023 and Committee of Management, Sahid Sansmaran Inter College and others vs. Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi and others, 1993 (91) ALJ 318.
C/M Goswami Tulsi Das Inter College And ... vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 19 December, 2022
2. It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioners that the impugned order is an ex-parte order and has been passed without serving, on the petitioner, a copy of the reports relied upon by the Additional Chief Secretary and without considering the objections filed by the petitioners. It has been argued that the aforesaid impugned order is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in the cases of Gautam Buddha Inter College and others vs. State of U.P. and others; 2016 (7) ADJ 665; C/M Goswami Tulsi Das Inter College and another vs. State of U.P. and 4 others, (Writ-C No. 37460 of 2022 decided on 19.12.2022; Chandrashekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. and 5 others, (Special Appeal No. 70 of 2023 decided on 07.02.2023 and Committee of Management, Sahid Sansmaran Inter College and others vs. Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi and others, 1993 (91) ALJ 318.
1