Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.51 seconds)State Of U.P. And Anr. vs Jaggo Alias Jagdish And Ors. on 30 March, 1971
reasonable doubt. Accordingly, accused persons Jagdish @ Jagga, 2026.04.09
14:52:45
+0530
State vs. Jagdish @ Jagga & Ors. FIR No. 84/2020 P.SSeelampur Page No. 5 of 6
Sumit @ Amit @ Gattau and Dewaki Nandan are acquitted of the
offences punishable U/s 341/323/325/34 IPC.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 325 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Govind And Ors. vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 7 April, 2003
In this regard reference may be made to a Division Bench
judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court passed in the case of Govind
& Ors vs. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 104(2003) DLT 510
wherein it was held that
"..In cases where ultimate chance of conviction
is very bleak or there is no prospect of the case
ending in conviction in such cases no useful
purpose is likely to be served by allowing a
criminal prosecution and trial to continue. It is
advisable to truncate or snip the proceedings
and save valuable time of the courts. The trial
should not be continued only for the purpose of Digitally
signed by
formally completing the proceedings to NOHRIA
NOHRIA
ANMOL
ANMOL Date:
Sh. Satish Mehra vs Delhi Administration & Anr on 31 July, 1996
Furthermore, in Satish Mehra vs.
Delhi Administration & Abr. 1996 JCC 507 Hon'ble Supreme Court
has held that valuable time of the court should not be wasted merely for
formal completion of procedure when there is no chance of the trial
culminating in conviction.
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1