Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.27 seconds)Sanjay Chandra vs Cbi on 23 November, 2011
69. The Applicant, untested by trial's crucible, basks in the
presumption of innocence, a platinum thread of criminal jurisprudence
(Article 21, Constitution of India). Bail's quintessence is neither
punishment nor pre-trial verdict but securing trial attendance sans
undue hardship. The Apex Court in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI, (2012) 1
SCC 40, illuminated:
Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy vs C.B.I on 9 May, 2013
Echoing this, Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. CBI, (2013) 7 SCC
28
439, affirmed:
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Neeru Yadav vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 29 September, 2015
47. Compounding her distinct role, the Applicant has thereby
established criminal antecedents through her demonstrated complicity
in economic offences of unprecedented scale. Such antecedents are
not peripheral but a statutory and precedential lodestar in bail
adjudication. The Supreme Court in Neeru Yadav v. State of U.P.,
(2016) 15 SCC 422, unequivocally held: