Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.81 seconds)Section 3 in Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 [Entire Act]
Gullapalli Bhadrayya vs Puttagunta Bapayya And Ors. on 1 January, 1800
705 to 714 of 1909 to the effect that an inamdar stands in no better position than the Zemindar if the inam is carved out of the Zemindar's interest; also in Bhadrayya v. Bapayya (1911) 21 M.L.J. 803. The position in this suit of the tenants under the minor inamdars appears to be stronger than that of the other tenants of the Agraharamdars, and the inamdar must show that he let in the defendants as tenants at the beginning of their occupation (Vide Parvataneni.
Section 6 in Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Madras Estates Land Act, 1908
Kandada Narasimhacharyalu Ayyavarlam ... vs Kavicherla Ramabrahmam on 3 February, 1913
In Narasimhacharyalu v. Ramabrahmam (1913) 24 M.L.J. 656, a presumption was said to arise that an Agraharamdar who obtained his inam from the Nuzvid Zemindar had only the Melvaram rights.