Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.33 seconds)

Sriven Marketing, vs Union Of India on 1 May, 2019

In Writ Petition No.6349 of 2011 (M/s. Sriven Marketing Vs. Union of India) filed in the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging public notice No.47/2009-14 dated 18.05.2011, counter affidavit was filed by Shri. K. Komalavally who was then serving as Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade in the office of Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Hyderabad. The counter affidavit was filed on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 i.e., Union of India through the Commerce 15/21 ::: Uploaded on - 21/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2021 22:39:47 ::: WP4838_16.doc Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce; Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture; and Director General of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, New Delhi. After dealing with import of maize (corn) under the tariff rate quota scheme of the Foreign Trade Policy, reference was made to notification No.21/2002-Customs dated 01.03.2002 providing for concessional rate of duty on import of four items under the tariff rate quota in accordance with the procedure notified through a public notice. Following the same, Director General of Foreign Trade issued public notice No.38/2002-07 dated 04.10.2002 laying down the procedure for import of various items under the tariff rate quota scheme. As per the procedure, import under the tariff rate quota was allowed only through eligible state trading enterprises. It was stipulated that state trading enterprises would have to import on behalf of actual users.
Telangana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R S Chauhan - Full Document
1