Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)Section 3 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
A.X.Gilbert vs State Of Kerala on 8 June, 2015
7. Having considered the legal propositions laid down by
this Court in Radhakrishnan's case as well as in X v. State of
Kerala, I am satisfied that the ingredients to invoke sections 3, 5
and 7 are not present in the case at hand. Necessarily, the
Crl.M.C.7148/17
5
prosecution under the above provisions has to fail. Crl.M.C is
accordingly liable to be allowed.
Section 5 in The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
C.R.Radhakrishnan vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 27 March, 2017
7. Having considered the legal propositions laid down by
this Court in Radhakrishnan's case as well as in X v. State of
Kerala, I am satisfied that the ingredients to invoke sections 3, 5
and 7 are not present in the case at hand. Necessarily, the
Crl.M.C.7148/17
5
prosecution under the above provisions has to fail. Crl.M.C is
accordingly liable to be allowed.
The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
1